Psychological Impact of various Therapeutic Modalities in Childhood Malignancy

Wael Samir Makar

Abstract


Background: The purpose of the study is to evaluate and compare the psychological impact of various therapeutic modalities in pediatric cancer by comparing them to healthy children across age groups. Methods: The semi-structured and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I Kids Test) were administered to 80 children including 40 cancer patients and 40 healthy children. Results: CNS   tumors   were   the   most   common   tumor   47.5%   followed   by

heamatological malignancies 35% and Non CNS solid tumors 17.5%. About two thirds of the sample reported social problems followed by school problems in 57.5% of cases. By analyzing the mood changes, there was significant depression, anxiety disorders, panic attacks and separation anxiety between the patients and the control (p= <0.001). The patients had also significant lack of attentionand stubbornness (p=<0.001). These problems did not show any difference between sex except for depression and social worries which were more in girls. These symptoms did not show any difference as regard receiving or not chemotherapy, radiotherapy or combination. Conclusion: The psychological problems were more evident in cancer patients compared to healthy children and was higher than developing countries. The present study highlighted the need of a health care team and integration of a comprehensive psychological support in the treatment plan inEgypt. This will improvequality of life and reduce the burden of treatment.

 

Key words: Psychological impact, childhood cancer, cultural difference. M-I-N-I kids test


Full Text:

PDF (FULL TEXT)

References


REFERENCES

American Cancer Society 2012. Cancer Facts and figures. Atlanta, Ga.

Barakat L.P, Kazak A.E, Gallagher P.R et al, 2000. Posttraumatic stress symptoms and stressful life events predict the long-term adjustment of survivors of childhood cancer and their mothers. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 7(4), 189-196.

Sheehan D.V, Sheehan K.H, Shytle R.D et al., 2010. Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). J Clin Psychiatry. March; 71 (3): 313-26.

Vance Y.H and Eiser C.2002. The school experience of the child with cancer. Child Care Health Dev; 28 (1): 5-19.

Searle N.S, Askins M, Bleyer W.A. 2003. home bound schooling is the least favorable option for continued education of adolescent cancer patients: a preliminary report. Med Pediatr Oncol; 40 (6): 380-4.

Larcombe I and Charlton A. 1996. Children's return to school after treatment for cancer: study days for teachers. J Cancer Educ; 11 (2): 102-5.

Chaudhry Z and Siddiqui S. 2012. Health related quality of life assessment in Pakistani paediatric cancer patients using Peds QLTM 4.0 generic core scale and PedsQL™. Cancer module. Health an Quality of life Outcomes 2012, 10: 52

Larcombe IJ, Walker J, Chalton A, Meller S, Jones Pm, Mott MG. 1991. Impact of childhood cancer on return to normal schooling. Br Med J. 301: 169-71. Canning EH, Hanser SB, Shade KA, Boyce WT. 1992.Mental disorders in chronically ill children: parent child discrepancy and physician identification. Pediatrics. 90: 692-71.

Canning EH, Hanser SB, Shade KA, Boyce WT. 1992. Mental disorders in chronically ill children: parent child discrepancy and physician identification. Pediatrics. 90: 692 6.

Pai A.L, Drotar D, Zebracki K et al. 2006. A meta-analysis of the effects of psychological interventions in pediatric oncology on outcomes of psychological distress and adjustment. Journal of Pediatric Psychology ; 31 (9): 978-988.

Boman K and Bodegard G. 2000. Long term coping in childhood cancer survivors: influence of illness, treatment and demographic background factors. Acta Paediatr, 89, 105-111.

Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. 2007: Impaired Health Related Quality of Life in children andadolescents with chronic conditions: A Comparative analysis of 10 disease clusters and 33 disease categories/severities utilizing the Peds QLTM 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes .5:1-15.

Meeske K.A, Patel S.K and Palmer S.N, 2007: Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life in Pediatric Cancer Survivors. Factors Associated with Health- Related Quality of Life in Pediatric Cancer Survivors," Pediatric Blood and Cancer, Vol. 49, 2007. pp. 298-305.

Cantrell M. A, 2007. "Health-Related Quality of Life in Child- hood Cancer: State of the Science,"Oncology Nursing Forum, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2007, pp. 103-111. doi:10.1188/07.ONF.103-lll.

Bhat SR, Goodwin TL, Burwinkle TM, Lansdale MF, Dahl GV, Huhn SL. 2005. Profile of daily life in children with brain tumors: an assessment of health related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 23(24): 5493 500.




DOI (PDF (FULL TEXT)): http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCC.2019.4.3.95

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Asia Pacific Journal of Cancer Care


 

  

PORTICO

 

Asia Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention 

West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention